The measured wear rates of various combinations of ceramic polyethylene and metal couples kaddick and pfaff 2002 are shown in table 7 2.
Ceramics wear rate.
The total wear rates of the cup and the head of ceramic on ceramic couples are about 35 fold lower than those of metal on metal.
Hence the standard wear coefficient value obtained from a volume loss versus distance curve is a function of the sliding distance.
Arnell in tribology and dynamics of engine and powertrain 2010.
Although com shows lower wear rates than mom in vitro wear testing of com shows widely varying results.
Ceramics can exhibit very low wear rates compared with metals and they are being used increasingly in tribological situations they also retain similar properties up to high temperatures and they are very unreactive chemically so they will certainly find increasing use in hostile environments.
The wear rate per unit sliding distance in the transient wear regime decreases until it has reached a constant value in the steady state wear regime.
This may be related to limitations of wear measuring methods.
The wear depth of pins was calculated by.
The wear rate of al 2 o 3 13 tio 2 ceramic coating was evaluated by the wear volume and that of pins by weighing them before and after the tests.
The hip joint.
Ceramic on metal com bearings are considered to be a promising alternative to polyethylene based bearings or hard on hard bearings ceramic on ceramic coc and metal on metal mom.
The head wear rate alone is about 100 to 300 fold lower.
Wear of ceramics and cermets.
Identifying the run in and steady state wear rates was a valuable step in processing the ceramic wear data and assessing its reliability.